Saturday, March 19, 2016

An Establishment of One

Now that the Establishment is crumbling, it is much easier to talk about and describe. Up until now, when one used this phrase, it was often not mutually understood in discourse what the term Establishment meant. This led to a great deal of misunderstanding.

But now everyone seems to understand what the term means, because the Establishment has become very easy to identify.

Apparently it means the individuals who comprise the "order" that is apparently losing its grip on power. The loosening of this power is resulting in a period of "world crisis," which marks the transition from one age to another. This is giving a lot of people a lot of anxiety, both within the Establishment and outside it.

So who is the Establishment? We can definitely include the following people, with very few exception: nearly all American politicians on the national level, including senior members of both major parties, as well as the people who give them money, including the large banks, as well as the apparatus of legal firms, etc., which facilitate this process. It also includes the intelligence community, senior military officers, members of globalist think thanks, and the part of Academia that supports all this. It also definitely includes all the large media organizations, and the people who own and operate them, as well as major media figures.

There are definitely other people in the Establishment, but the above list is a good start, I believe.

Notice the list includes many people in politics and in the public eye.

Notice as well that the number of people is very large.


All of this last part is very ironic, given that once upon a time, when it all started out, the idea of the Establishment was meant explicitly to be apolitical and outside the public eye.

Moreover, not surprisingly, the term Establishment was meant to refer to a very small group of people, and ultimately, if one took a poll of the insiders, the idea Establishment would have been embodied arguably in single individual, upon whose identity nearly all of them would have agreed.



No comments: