Today was a watershed day. A shattering of the narrative, or at least a severe weakening of it. The Michigan hearings seem to have done it. Many people who were leaning towards believing there was widespread fraud now realize that "we did not have a real election," as Scott Adams put it. Adams is a good bellwether. He has been pushing back strongly against the idea that the election was "normal," but was not a convicted believer in widespread multi-state fraud until today. It is almost beginning to feel as if Trump has the upper hand in public discourse going forward. As part of this, he is making the entire mainstream media irrelevant.
Just a thought: what would be the most damaging thing to happen to the media at this point? What if there was direct evidence to implicate the heads of various media organizations in the fraud? What if this emerged over the next week? How would this effect their narrative?
Thank you, Michigan!
No comments:
Post a Comment