Friday, December 31, 2021

Remembering the Pleasant Whooshing Sound of Microfilm Machines

 If you live long enough, things in life come in cycles. I was marveling at this just now while doing some research online for an ongoing research project. The research had me using my laptop to look up PDFs of articles from the New York Times in March 1912, specifically the ones that contained the first reports of the discovery of the South Pole by Roald Amundsen and his party of fellow Norwegians. 

Exactly forty years ago, in the Spring of 1982, I was a junior at Fort Collins High School, and I enrolled in a course in the English department on compositional writing. The class was taught by Mrs. (Sandy) Turk, whom I had previously taken for an American literature course as a sophomore, where we read The Scarlet Letter. Mrs. Turk had the reputation of being very rigorous and tough, and that is one of the reasons I enjoyed her courses very much. In another course of hers, Grammar Review for the College Bound, I learned how to diagram sentences, mapping out the parts of speech. That course may have been the high point of my academic career. I routinely blew out the curve on the exams, scoring much higher than the other students, including the "smart girls" who were used to being the best in the class, and who were irked that a boy could come and show them up so easily. Mrs. Turk, although on the English faculty, was decidedly not a feminist. By certain comments in regard to Hester Prynne in Hawthorne, I concluded that she was one of those women who are wise to the wiles of femininity, and who can provide insight into female nature to clueless young men such as yours truly. No doubt she had voted for Reagan. 

In that compositional writing course, we had to pursue a number of projects, including a compare-and-contrast paper, and an argumentative position paper. The big project, however, was to be a research project, on any subject we chose, that would specifically require us to use the microfilm resources in the library of Colorado State University, the campus of which was across the street from the high school.

Many of the students found this project to be a burden, but I absolutely loved the challenge. Back then I was much more of a rules-follower than I was later in life, so I had no problem conforming to the instructions. I did what teachers asked me to do. Dutifully I use the family car to drive to the CSU Library. As a routine, night after night, I went down into the basement where one found the microfilm archives of the New York Times, checking out the spools I needed for my research that night, and then loading them up into the machine. How I love the whooshing sound that the spools made in the mechanical reels as one scrolled through them, and then pressed the rapid rewind button.

For the subject of my research paper, I had chosen the discovery of the South Pole, and specifically the race between Amundsen and Scott in 1911-1912 to be the first to reach there. I had been fascinated with Antarctica and its exploration even in elementary school, reading all the books on it in my school library. So I was already familiar with the overall facts, including the triumph of Amundsen in reaching the pole and returning, and the tragedy of Scott and his party, with their Shetland ponies, perishing just miles away from salvation.

I was very methodical in my research, tracking down the newspaper accounts from the embarkation of both expeditions in 1910 until the final reports in the spring of 1912. After a couple weeks, I set about writing up the paper, meticulously citing the articles in an account I wrote using one of the school's typewriters. I've always been prone to typos, as I am still now, so I went through lots of correction tape and whiteout, but in the end the paper was perfect and I got an A for it and for the course too.

Weirdly enough, just days after I finished that paper, an old-style shooting war broke out in the South Atlantic Ocean, over a group of obscure islands that only Antarctica geeks like my knew about, namely the Falkland Islands.  It was the center of world news for weeks on end, in a throwback way. At the time I already had map of the Falklands on my bedroom wall, and had always wanted to go there. I was pissed off that Argentina had invaded them and spoiled it all, and put the islands in the focus of the attention of the world. The final project in Mrs. Turk's class that spring was the argumentative paper, and I very enthusiastically typed up a well-documented paper on the righteousness of the British cause versus the Argentines in claiming sovereignty over the islands.

As I got older and went to college, my boyhood fascination for Antarctica waned. I went many years without caring much about it, in the way I once had. Even a stint working in Arctic climatological research in Alaska in 1987 didn't rekindle my interest much.  When a friend of mine recently proposed that we book a tour to the ice sheet, I responded with a rather negative sentiment. I could only imagine the relief I would feel at getting back.

Lately, however, due to a scientific research project I am following my mind has turned to Antarctica again with a ferocious interest, and this morning, with my laptop, the descendant of the Apple IIe computers of the early 1980s, I am sitting in my comfortable home office looking up the very same articles in the New York Times that I did forty years ago, and snipping out sections and printing them out on my laser printer, compiling a massive research report that probably only I will ever see. It is the making of such things that one finds the great value, even if one never consults them directly.

These kinds of cycles make me think about the surreal comedy of time. When I sat in the basement of the CSU Library, exactly seventy years had passed since the reports of Amundsen's success had surfaced in the world press, following his return to Australia. Now forty years more have passed. Forty is less than seventy, but it is approaching the same order of magnitude.

The world has changed a lot since 1982, but compared to the changes between 1912 and 1982, it seems almost stagnant. Pretty much everything that has changed since the 1980s is because of the Internet. The world looks mostly the same in a lot of ways. Automobiles are sleeker and houses are bigger. People wear the same casual clothes, but almost everyone is fatter, even the young people, because of the changes in our life styles. 

The Falklands are once again quiet and forgotten by the world. My old high school was shuttered in the 1990s and was remodeled to become part of CSU itself. The basement of the CSU library was flooded in a massive rainstorm that inundated the campus in 1997, and caused the drowning of people living in a nearby trailer park. I wonder what became of the microfilm I used.  

Everything is online now, preserved digitally. Someday all those 0's and 1's may be all that is left of our entire civilization. 






Friday, December 24, 2021

Does She Like Animals? And Do Animals Like Her?

Christmas Eve. It rained all night and all morning. The sound was the best thing I've slept to since our first night on Kauai, at the Sealodge in Princeville, where we opened the window and heard the pounding of the surf in the dark, a couple hundred feet below at the bottom of the cliff.

When the rains stopped today I walked over to get the mail, finding a Christmas card from my cousin in Florida, and a stack of solicitations for charity donations, as well a key to a package in one of the lockers.

This morning while we wrapped presents for each other, and for Ginger's folks, and her niece, whom we will see tomorrow in Mesa, Ginger turned on the television to EWTN, watching a scratchy old movie about the nativity, followed the live feed provided by the Vatican News Service of the evening mass from St. Peters. I noticed that the prayers were in Latin. It was the new mass in Latin. Many folks wouldn't know what a strange thing this was. to see at this moment in Church history.

We are watching Christmas in Connecticut for the second time in three days. I was reluctant to watch it again so soon after the last time, but it was on TCM again, and there was nothing else on. Two nights I had called out a hundred new things I noticed about the movie, and the intricacies of the story and the characters. I thought there was nothing left to say. Already I have noticed a dozen new things this time. Among them I noticed that the cow's real name was not Mecushla. That's the name that Dennis Morgan's character bestows on it, based on what he thinks is the name of the fictional cow in Elizabeth Lane's magazine columns about her fictional farm. At least I think that's the case. But as soon as he says it, the cow becomes Mecushla. He names it. It's very Adam-like energy, from Genesis. The man names the animals.

There is much animal energy in the movie. During their romantic interlude walking the cow together, this furnishes the qualifying questions that Barbara Stanwyck and Dennis Morgan exchange with each, in their courtship. Does she like animals? And do animals like her?

Felix (S.Z. Sakall)  is the cow .They become one. Likewise the judge and the horse (the pulls the carriage) are one. The cow and the horse both act spontaneously in the story to move the two lovers towards matrimony. The cow gives them their romantic interlude. The horse takes them into the hands of the State, which will provide them the legal bond required by matrimony and society. That the romantic interlude was quasi-illicit (because Stanwyck's character is posing as a married woman) means that the corresponding interaction with the State finds them in jail. But the judge whom they face is friendly, and marries them instead. Such is the lightness of their punishment, because Stanwyck was not really married after all, and thus besides the rhetoric she expresses (all but endorsing flirting by married woman), she did nothing wrong. Neither did he.